Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Climate, Raphaël Glucksmann

Emissions cut by 2030, compared with 1990: −55% emissions in 2030 and −90% in 2040, European targets

Direction of change: unchanged, compared with current law.

The lever. Target for cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, as a percentage of their 1990 level. Direction rule: ↑ more ambitious emissions reduction target.

« Atteindre la neutralité carbone d’ici 2050 exige donc d’accélérer sans détour : –55% d’émissions de gaz à effet de serre en 2030, –90% en 2040. »1

Translation by the editorsAchieving carbon neutrality by 2050 therefore requires accelerating without hesitation: –55% greenhouse gas emissions in 2030, –90% in 2040.

Place publique, « Cop 30 : La France et l'Europe doivent imposer leur leadership climatique », 10 November 2025. Position taken from a document of the candidate’s party or movement, not from a presidential programme.

No programme released. Positions taken from public statements, words of associates or documents of the candidate’s party, each dated and sourced; last recorded on 21 October 2026.

Encoding

No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.

Costing

Announced by the candidate

not announced

The cited source does not cost this measure.

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

lever that cannot be costed

Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. Code de l'énergie, art. L100-4, I, 1° (version in force since 24 June 2023, amended by act no. 2023-491 of 22 June 2023): 40% reduction in GHG emissions between 1990 and 2030, carbon neutrality in 2050. The SNBC-3 (decree no. 2026-636 of 16 July 2026, JO of 18 July 2026) sets carbon budgets of 342 Mt/year (2024-2028), 262 Mt/year (2029-2033) and 194 Mt/year (2034-2038), excluding sinks. At EU level, the commitment is -55% net. The Gremillet private member's bill planned to move from 40% to 50% gross; it had not amended the article at the date of reading (13 October 2026, no later version on Légifrance).

Horizon. Not applicable.

Limits. A target has no cost of its own: the cost runs through the instruments (renovation, rail, support for renewables, public investment). Costing them here as well would be double counting. As a benchmark only: according to I4CE (2024), reaching -55% in 2030 requires €71bn per year of additional public spending by 2030, with regulation and taxation unchanged. The figure falls to about €39bn, of which €18bn for the State, if regulation is tightened and aid refocused. In 2024, public authorities spent €32bn on climate. The I4CE figure is a need, not a cost relative to current policies.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

  1. Place publique, « Cop 30 : La France et l'Europe doivent imposer leur leadership climatique », 10 November 2025. Position taken from a document of the candidate’s party or movement, not from a presidential programme. Read the source (Place publique, « Cop 30 : La France et l'Europe doivent imposer leur leadership climatique »).

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)