Overseas territories, Raphaël Glucksmann
Status and autonomy of the territories: New Caledonia: return to the spirit of the Nouméa Accords
Direction of change: change of another kind, or uncertain direction, compared with current law.
The lever. Institutional development of the overseas territories: autonomy, local powers, special status. Direction rule: ↑ greater autonomy.
« En Nouvelle-Calédonie, renouer avec l’esprit des accords de Nouméa, un dialogue respectueux et une co-construction politique. »1Translation by the editorsIn New Caledonia, return to the spirit of the Nouméa Accords, respectful dialogue and political co-construction.
Place publique, « Acte un – Notre vision pour la France » (codirecteurs de la publication : Aurore Lalucq et Raphaël Glucksmann), 23 June 2025. Position taken from a document of the candidate’s party or movement, not from a presidential programme.
No programme released. Positions taken from public statements, words of associates or documents of the candidate’s party, each dated and sourced; last recorded on 21 October 2026.
Encoding
No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The cited source does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
lever that cannot be costed
Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. Constitution: the DROM are governed by art. 73 (legislative identity, adaptations possible), the overseas collectivities by art. 74 (own status set by organic law) and New Caledonia by Title XIII. New Caledonia: the Bougival agreement (July 2025), supplemented by the Élysée-Oudinot agreement (January 2026), provided for an « État de la Nouvelle-Calédonie » [“State of New Caledonia”] and a Caledonian nationality. The constitutional bill, adopted by the Senate on 24 February 2026, was rejected by the National Assembly on 2 April 2026 (preliminary motion to reject, 190 votes to 107).
Horizon. Not applicable.
Limits. No identifiable static budgetary effect. Transfers of powers come with financial transfers that depend on negotiation. The follow-up after the rejection of April 2026 is not verified at the date of the cost schedule.
- Constitution, art. 73 et 74: « Art. 73 al. 1 : « Dans les départements et les régions d'outre-mer, les lois et règlements sont applicables de plein droit. » ; art. 74 al. 1 : « Les collectivités d'outre-mer régies par le présent article ont un statut qui tient compte des intérêts propres » »
- LCP, « Nouvelle-Calédonie : l'Assemblée nationale rejette le projet de loi constitutionnelle », 2026-04-02: « Motion de rejet préalable adoptée par 190 voix contre 107 (relevé dans le résumé de recherche) »
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- Place publique, « Acte un – Notre vision pour la France » (codirecteurs de la publication : Aurore Lalucq et Raphaël Glucksmann), 23 June 2025, p. 65. Position taken from a document of the candidate’s party or movement, not from a presidential programme. Read the source (Place publique, « Acte un – Notre vision pour la France » (codirecteurs de la publication : Aurore Lalucq et Raphaël Glucksmann)).
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)