Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Agriculture and trade, Marine Tondelier

Free trade agreements (Mercosur): Do not ratify CETA, Mercosur and the other pending agreements

Direction of change: decrease, compared with current law.

The lever. Position on the European Union's trade agreements, including the agreement with Mercosur: ratification, mirror clauses, rejection. Direction rule: ↑ more agreements or openness; ↓: refusal, protections.

« Ne pas ratifier les accords européens en attente qui affectent le climat et la biodiversité notamment les traités avec le Canada (CETA) le Vietnam, Singapour, le Chili, le Mexique, le Mercosur, l’Indonésie et le Japon. »1

Translation by the editorsDo not ratify the pending European agreements that affect the climate and biodiversity, in particular the treaties with Canada (CETA), Vietnam, Singapore, Chile, Mexico, Mercosur, Indonesia and Japan.

Encoding

No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.

Costing

Announced by the candidate

not announced

The programme does not cost this measure.

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

lever that cannot be costed

Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. EU-Mercosur agreement: the Council authorised its signature on 9 January 2026 by qualified majority, despite France voting against. On 21 January 2026, the European Parliament referred it to the CJEU for an opinion (334 votes for, 324 against, 11 abstentions), which suspends its consent. The Commission announced provisional application of the interim trade agreement from early May 2026; its actual entry into application has not been checked. Trade policy is an exclusive competence of the EU.

Horizon. Not applicable.

Limits. No measurable direct budgetary effect. Customs duties are an EU own resource. Sectoral effects (agriculture, industry) are a matter for impact studies, outside the static costing. A national « sortie » [“exit”] or « refus » [“refusal”] has legal force only for the part of the agreement subject to national ratification.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

  1. Pour une prospérité écologique, programme des Écologistes, p. 64. Open the document at this page.

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)