Health, Gabriel Attal
Where doctors set up practice: Against mandatory placement: the priority is the number of doctors
Direction of change: unchanged, compared with current law.
The lever. Rules on where doctors set up practice across the country: freedom, incentives, or regulation in areas already well served. Direction rule: ↑ more regulation of where doctors set up practice.
Words reported by attalpresident.fr, compte rendu des débats publics à Blois et Bourges: Imposer aux généralistes leur lieu d'installation serait contre-productif, car on ne réussirait pas à couvrir tous les besoins. Le sujet est avant tout le nombre de médecins.1
Translation by the editorsImposing on general practitioners where they set up practice would be counter-productive, because we would not succeed in covering all needs. The issue is above all the number of doctors.
Words of Gabriel Attal reported by attalpresident.fr, compte rendu des débats publics à Blois et Bourges, 5 October 2026. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme.
Encoding
No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The cited source does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
lever that cannot be costed
Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. Doctors are free to set up practice where they wish. Zoning and incentive payments by the ARS (regional health agencies). Selective agreements with health insurance (conventionnement sélectif) apply to other professions (nurses, physiotherapists). The cross-party Garot private member's bill on regulation was adopted at first reading in the National Assembly in 2025 (parliamentary shuttle not checked).
Horizon. Not applicable.
Limits. Regulating where doctors set up practice has almost no budgetary cost. Aid for setting up practice and the funding of the 4th year of general practice training can be costed, but are not sourced here.
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- attalpresident.fr, compte rendu des débats publics à Blois et Bourges, 5 October 2026. Words of Gabriel Attal reported by this outlet: the text quoted is the article’s, not their exact words. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme. Read the source (attalpresident.fr, compte rendu des débats publics à Blois et Bourges).
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)