Immigration, Jean-Luc Mélenchon
State medical aid (Aide médicale de l'État): Guarantee access to the AME (state medical aid)
Direction of change: unchanged, compared with current law.
The lever. Coverage of healthcare for foreign nationals in an irregular situation: maintained, reduced to emergencies or abolished. Direction rule: ↑ broader AME (State medical aid).
« Garantir l’accès à l’aide médicale d’État (AME) »1Translation by the editorsGuarantee access to state medical aid (AME)
Encoding
The position maintains current law: no parameter changes.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The programme does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
€0bn
per year for the public accounts, zero cost.
The calculation
- Status quo: The position maintains current law: zero cost compared with current policies.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. AME (state medical aid; Code de l'action sociale et des familles, art. L251-1 et seq.): coverage of healthcare for irregular migrants resident in France for more than 3 months, subject to an income ceiling. Prior approval for certain scheduled care during the first 9 months. Actual spending of €1,386.8m in 2024 (+15.5%) and €1,385m forecast for 2025 (DSS), whereas the appropriations in the PLF 2026 are €1,208.3m. 461,833 beneficiaries at 31 March 2025. Spending split 61% hospital care and 39% community care.
Horizon. Full year 2032, current €bn, compared with current law
Limits. 2032 projection calculated by the editors: €1,385m in 2025 × (1+g)^7, with g = 3% (low), 4% (central, rate anticipated by the Senate for 2026) and 6% (high, average since 2009). Abolition: GROSS and static saving. It ignores the shift to urgent care (€132m in 2024, already partly borne by national health insurance), hospitals' unrecoverable debts and health effects. The Évin-Stefanini report (Dec. 2023) considers the AMU (emergency medical aid) « inappropriée » [“inappropriate”] and costs no saving. There is no official costing of the AMU. The range is constructed: the low end takes the order of magnitude of the Senate amendment (-€200m), the high end removes the whole share of outpatient care (39% × 1.82 ≈ €0.7bn), the central value is halfway. Voted appropriations underestimate actual spending every year: the State's debt to social security in respect of AME (state medical aid) would reach €362m to €428m at the end of 2025. The cost schedule therefore costs on actual spending, not on appropriations. The three options are mutually exclusive (overlaps declared).
- Sénat, commission des affaires sociales, L'Essentiel PLF 2026 « Santé » (avis Florence Lassarade), 2025-12-03: « « Les dépenses d'AME ont progressé de 6 % par an en moyenne depuis 2009, et de 40 % entre 2021 et 2025. Alors que les crédits consacrés à l'AME resteraient plafonnés à 1 208,3 millions d'euros en 2026, les dépenses réelles d'AME ont atteint 1 387 millions d'euros en 2024 » ; « La direction de la sécurité sociale (DSS) estime ainsi que la dépense prévisionnelle s'établira à 1 385 millions d'euros pour l'exercice 2025 » ; « En 2026, une progression de 4 % est anticipée » ; « Les prestations hospitalières représentent 61 % de cette dépense » ; « un amendement minorant les crédits de l'AME de 200 millions d'euros » »
- Sénat, rapport d'information n° 841 (2024-2025), Vincent Delahaye, commission des finances, sur l'aide médicale de l'État, 2025-07: « « le coût total réel de l'AME est de 1 386,8 millions d'euros, soit une hausse de 15,5 % des dépenses par rapport à 2023 » ; « l'État ne prend pas en charge l'intégralité de la dépense d'AME pour soins urgents, puisqu'il ne verse que 70 millions d'euros à la sécurité sociale sur un coût total de 132 millions d'euros » »
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- L’Avenir en commun (édition 2025), p. 63. Open the document at this page.
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)