Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Minimum incomes and benefits, Bruno Retailleau

RSA (minimum income), amount and conditions: RSA replaced: €300/month, €550 with 15 h of training or job-seeking

Direction of change: decrease, compared with current law.

The lever. Revenu de solidarité active (RSA, minimum income): amount, eligibility conditions, and hours of activity or support required of recipients. Direction rule: ↑ higher amount or relaxed conditions.

« Sans activité ni revenu : 300 euros par mois, complétés par 250 euros dès quinze heures de formation ou de recherche d'emploi. »1

Translation by the editorsWith no activity or income: 300 euros a month, topped up by 250 euros from fifteen hours of training or job seeking.

Encoding

ParameterCurrent lawProgrammeEffective date or horizon
Increase in the RSA (minimum income) flat-rate amount beyond indexation0%-15.6%* (outside the range measured by the source: linear extrapolation) (assumption by the editors, see the costing)Full year, €bn per year

Costing

Announced by the candidate

+€2bn

per year, gain for the public accounts. « Un gain annuel de 2 milliards d'euros » [“An annual gain of 2 billion euros”] (saving, for the activity incentive income as a whole)

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

+€2.7bn* (outside the range measured by the source: linear extrapolation)

per year for the public accounts, saving, range +€2.3bn to +€2.7bn.

* Outside the range measured by the source: linear extrapolation (measured range: 0% to 10%).

The calculation

  • Increase in the RSA (minimum income) flat-rate amount beyond indexation: (-15.6 − 0) ÷ 1 = -15.6 times “+1% on the RSA flat-rate amount (beyond indexation)”, each a cost of €0.17bn (0.15 to 0.17). Proposed value outside the range measured by the source: linear extrapolation (measured range: 0% to 10%). Range measured: cumulative increase of about 10% in the flat-rate amount (exceptional upratings from 2013 to 2017). Beyond that, the entry of new households is no longer covered: linear extrapolation, flagged as such. A decrease in the flat-rate amount, which no source read costs, is costed in the same way, by linear extrapolation flagged as such.

Assumption by the editors. Partial costing. Read as the RSA lump-sum amount reduced to €550 a month (against €651.69), i.e. −15.6%, the more cautious of the two amounts cited (€550 from fifteen hours of training or job seeking, €300 without); below 0% (measured range: increases of 0 to 10%, upratings from 2013 to 2017), linear extrapolation, at the coefficient of the 2020 order updated to 2026 euros (€0.17bn per point; 0.15 for the effect on recipient households alone); the exit of households that a cut in the lump sum would cause is not costed. Not costed: the €300 amount for recipients without those fifteen hours, the top-up reduced by 30% of earnings in work, the merger with the in-work benefit and the ASS, the absence of any link to family situation. The announced gain (€2bn) concerns the activity incentive income as a whole.

Coefficient calculated by the editors from solidarites.gouv.fr, Revalorisation annuelle au 1er avril 2026: the position is marked as an assumption by the editors.

Figure announced by the candidate: no gap calculated: the announcement covers a different scope or a different year.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. Flat-rate amount of €651.69 per month for a single person with no resources since 1 April 2026 (+0.8%). Open from age 25, and from 18 to 24 for single parents or young people with a certain period of work. Automatic registration with France Travail and commitment contract since 1 January 2025 (Act No. 2023-1196). Spending: €12,218m in 2023, including the Christmas bonus (Drees), and €12.2bn paid by the Caf (family allowance funds) in 2025; 1.84 million recipient households at end-2024 (Drees), 1.89 million in June 2026.

Horizon. Full year, €bn per year

Limits. Option versement-automatique-rsa: same costing as the recours-total-rsa option of the versement-automatique lever (DREES, Dossiers no. 92: €750m of RSA (minimum income) not paid per quarter in 2018, i.e. €3bn per year, 2018 euros, not updated), for a position filed under the RSA; the two overlap entirely (declared overlap). Option limite-trois-ans (calculation by the editors, 18 October 2026): RSA spending (€12.2bn paid by the Caf (family allowance funds) in 2025) × share of beneficiaries (recipients and spouses) present for at least three years, which DREES does not publish as such: at least 37% (five years or more, end of 2023: lower bound, €4.5bn), at most 59% (two years or more: upper bound, €7.2bn), about 52% by spreading the two-to-five-year band (22%) evenly: central value, €6.3bn. The share of beneficiaries is taken as the share of spending. Static: neither shifts to other benefits (accommodation, social assistance, other minimum benefits) nor returns to work are counted; an exemption (people unfit for work, on a social support pathway, or who fulfil a requirement in return) reduces the saving in an unmeasured proportion. The former coefficient (€0.13bn per % increase in the flat-rate amount, i.e. 1% of 2022 spending) is withdrawn: the allowance is differential, and raising the flat-rate amount by €X adds €X to each household whatever its resources. The 1.89 million households × €6.52 (1% of the flat-rate amount for a single person) × 12 months alone give €0.15bn per %, before the family scale and new entrants. The exact cost requires the distribution of households according to the family scale (DREES, CNAF) or a microsimulation (OpenFisca), not available here. The flat-rate amount of the in-work benefit (prime d'activité) is a separate parameter. Non-take-up (34%) reduces the actual cost. Coefficient used: the State set at €1.40bn per year, from September 2018, the cost borne by the départements due to the exceptional increases in the flat-rate amount from 2013 to 2017 (five decrees, about +10% in total excluding inflation), i.e. €0.14bn per point, in 2018 euros. This figure relates to the RSA alone (the in-work benefit is another lever) and includes households that entered thanks to the raising of the threshold. Updated to the 2026 flat-rate amount (€651.69 against €550.93 in 2018, i.e. +18%): 0.14 × 651.69 / 550.93 ≈ €0.17bn per point, central value and upper bound since 18 October 2026 (calculation by the editors, in 2026 euros); lower bound, €0.15bn, the mechanical effect alone on households already receiving the allowance (1.89 million × €6.52 × 12 months, DREES and 2026 order), before the family scale. The entry of new households opened up by a large increase in the flat-rate amount is included only within the limit of the 2013 to 2017 increases (about 10%): beyond that, it is not costed, and a position that goes further is partial. Full take-up (versement-automatique lever) would increase this cost. External benchmarks, not counted, for an income guarantee at the poverty line, a broader scope than an increase in the flat-rate amount: €36bn according to iFRAP (April 2022, threshold of €1,063, of which €9.5bn for young people); about €25bn according to La France insoumise (2021 amendments); €30bn in its counter-budget of November 2017.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

This lever in the method · Costing for Bruno Retailleau

  1. Projet Retailleau, mesure n°26 « Permettre à ceux qui reprennent un emploi de gagner plus » (revenu d'incitation). Read the programme page.

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)