Society, Marine Le Pen
Secularism (laïcité): Veil banned gradually by referendum, by decree in certain places
Direction of change: increase, compared with current law.
The lever. Application of secularism (laïcité): religious symbols in public spaces, at school, at university, in sport, funding of religions. Direction rule: ↑ religious neutrality extended or stricter.
Words reported by TF1info, direct de l’émission « Objectif 2027 » (LCI): Interrogée sur la forme que prendrait cette lutte, Marine Le Pen évoque une "loi" soumise "par référendum" avec "l’objectif d’interdire le voile, et nous le ferons, si les Français nous en donnent mandat, progressivement" hormis dans certains sites où un "décret" sera public "juste après" le vote pour interdire le voile "dans les universités, les sorties scolaires, les fédérations sportives, les bâtiments publics".1
Translation by the editorsAsked about the form this fight would take, Marine Le Pen mentions a “law” submitted “by referendum” with “the aim of banning the veil, and we will do it, if the French give us a mandate, gradually”, except in certain places where a “decree” will be published “just after” the vote to ban the veil “in universities, school outings, sports federations, public buildings”.
Words of Marine Le Pen reported by TF1info, direct de l’émission « Objectif 2027 » (LCI), 16 September 2026. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme.
No programme released. Positions taken from public statements, words of associates or documents of the candidate’s party, each dated and sourced; last recorded on 18 October 2026.
Encoding
No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The cited source does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
lever that cannot be costed
Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. Constitution, art. 1 (« République indivisible, laïque, démocratique et sociale » [“indivisible, secular, democratic and social Republic”]); act of 9 December 1905 (separation of the Churches and the State); act of 15 March 2004 (religious symbols in state schools); act no. 2021-1109 of 24 August 2021 reinforcing respect for the principles of the Republic. Alsace-Moselle: Concordat regime maintained.
Horizon. Not applicable.
Limits. Lever of principles, with no budgetary effect. Sole exception: ending the Alsace-Moselle concordat would abolish the State's payment of ministers of religion, but no figure was found in this research. The references to the laws of 1905, 2004 and 2021 are cited without online checking.
- Constitution, art. 1er: « « La France est une République indivisible, laïque, démocratique et sociale. » »
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- TF1info, direct de l’émission « Objectif 2027 » (LCI), 16 September 2026. Words of Marine Le Pen reported by this outlet: the text quoted is the article’s, not their exact words. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme. Read the source (TF1info, direct de l’émission « Objectif 2027 » (LCI)).
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)