Society, Marine Tondelier
Secularism (laïcité): Repeal the separatism law, rely on the 1905 law's policing of religions
Direction of change: abolition of a scheme, compared with current law.
The lever. Application of secularism (laïcité): religious symbols in public spaces, at school, at university, in sport, funding of religions. Direction rule: ↑ religious neutrality extended or stricter.
« Abroger la loi séparatisme et s’appuyer sur la police des cultes existante dans la loi de 1905 pour condamner les pratiques obscurantistes et sectaires. »1Translation by the editorsRepeal the separatism law and rely on the existing policing of religious worship in the 1905 law to condemn obscurantist and sectarian practices.
Encoding
No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The programme does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
lever that cannot be costed
Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. Constitution, art. 1 (« République indivisible, laïque, démocratique et sociale » [“indivisible, secular, democratic and social Republic”]); act of 9 December 1905 (separation of the Churches and the State); act of 15 March 2004 (religious symbols in state schools); act no. 2021-1109 of 24 August 2021 reinforcing respect for the principles of the Republic. Alsace-Moselle: Concordat regime maintained.
Horizon. Not applicable.
Limits. Lever of principles, with no budgetary effect. Sole exception: ending the Alsace-Moselle concordat would abolish the State's payment of ministers of religion, but no figure was found in this research. The references to the laws of 1905, 2004 and 2021 are cited without online checking.
- Constitution, art. 1er: « « La France est une République indivisible, laïque, démocratique et sociale. » »
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- Pour une prospérité écologique, programme des Écologistes, p. 173. Open the document at this page.
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)