Agriculture and trade, David Lisnard
Pesticides: Reasoned use of plant protection products, new genomic techniques authorised
Direction of change: change of another kind, or uncertain direction, compared with current law.
The lever. Use of plant protection products in agriculture: bans, reduction or relaxation of the rules. Direction rule: ↑ use more widely permitted; ↓: bans, reduction.
« Enfin, nous plaidons pour l’autorisation des nouvelles techniques génomiques (NTG), l’usage raisonné des phytosanitaires sur base scientifique, et une réduction de la part des aides conditionnées à des critères idéologiques. »1Translation by the editorsFinally, we argue for the authorisation of new genomic techniques (NGTs), the reasoned use of plant protection products on a scientific basis, and a reduction in the share of aid made conditional on ideological criteria.
Encoding
No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.
Costing
Announced by the candidate
not announced
The programme does not cost this measure.
Published costings
none
No external costing of this position recorded to date.
Our calculation
lever that cannot be costed
Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.
Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule
Current law. Act no. 2025-794 of 11 August 2025 aiming to lift constraints on farming (loi Duplomb). The Constitutional Council (decision no. 2025-891 DC of 7 August 2025) struck down the reintroduction by derogation of acetamiprid, a neonicotinoid, on the basis of the Charte de l'environnement (Environment Charter). The Ecophyto 2030 strategy sets targets for reducing risks and use; the percentage and the indicator are not cited in the source.
Horizon. Not applicable.
Limits. This is a regulatory lever, with no significant budgetary cost. The support plans (Ecophyto, transition aid) have announced amounts, used as they are if a candidate changes them. The quantified targets of Ecophyto 2030 are not cited from the source (agriculture.gouv.fr pages returned a 404 error during the research).
- Conseil constitutionnel, décision n° 2025-891 DC du 7 août 2025, loi visant à lever les contraintes à l’exercice du métier d’agriculteur, 2025-08-07: « 84. Par conséquent, sans qu’il soit besoin d’examiner les autres griefs, le d du 3 ° de l’article 2 est contraire à la Constitution. […] Article 1er. - Sont contraires à la Constitution les dispositions suivantes de la loi visant à lever les contraintes à l’exercice du métier d’agriculteur : le troisième alinéa du b et le d du 3 ° de l’article 2 ; l’article 8. »
- Loi n° 2025-794 du 11 août 2025 (AIDA Ineris), 2025-08-11: « Loi n° 2025-794 du 11/08/25 visant à lever les contraintes à l'exercice du métier d'agriculteur (intitulé lu dans le résultat de recherche). »
How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.
- Nouvelle Énergie, programme, page Agriculture (page non datée). Read the programme page.
Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)