Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Higher education and research, Marine Tondelier

Student support: Raise and overhaul grants for students attached to their family's household

Direction of change: increase, compared with current law.

The lever. Means-tested grants, student housing, catering, autonomy allowance: amounts and eligible groups. Direction rule: ↑ more aid.

« Revaloriser et refonder le système des bourses étudiantes pour les jeunes rattachés fiscalement à leur famille. »1

Translation by the editorsIncrease and overhaul the student grant system for young people attached to their family’s tax household.

Encoding

No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.

Costing

Announced by the candidate

not announced

The programme does not cost this measure.

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

not costed

Increase in student grants with no amount: nothing to cost.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. Means-tested grants (bourses sur critères sociaux), not indexed. The highest tier is €6,335/year (unchanged since 2023). 662,000 grant holders in 2024-2025. Programme 231 Vie étudiante (student life): €3.2bn, 78% of it direct aid (PLF 2026). The second phase of the grants reform is suspended. Since 4 May 2026, the €1 meal has been open to all students in all university restaurants, without means testing (€50m from the State in 2026).

Horizon. full year 2032, €bn/year

Limits. The autonomy allowance would replace part of existing aid (€5.9bn to €6bn: grants, student APL, the additional half-share for tax purposes). Its net cost is therefore about €20bn to €24bn, with an estimation gap between the rapporteur (€30bn) and the minister (€25bn). The +10% option is calculated on 78% of €3.2bn. The €1 meal for all students has been in force since May 2026: a position calling for it is status quo. Its cost (€50m for eight months of 2026 according to the ministry) is part of current policies.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

  1. Pour une prospérité écologique, programme des Écologistes, p. 126. Open the document at this page.

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)