Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Agriculture and trade, Bruno Retailleau

Common Agricultural Policy: European CAP, national ceilings guaranteed for seven years

Direction of change: change of another kind, or uncertain direction, compared with current law.

The lever. Position on the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy: budget, distribution of aid, reform or exit. Direction rule: ↑ more aid.

« Veiller à ce que la PAC demeure pleinement européenne et pluriannuelle, avec des enveloppes agricoles dédiées sous forme de plafonds nationaux garantis sur sept ans. »1

Translation by the editorsEnsure that the CAP remains fully European and multiannual, with dedicated agricultural envelopes in the form of national ceilings guaranteed over seven years.

Encoding

No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.

Costing

Announced by the candidate

not announced

The programme does not cost this measure.

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

lever that cannot be costed

Lever with no coefficient in the cost schedule: the position is compared, not costed.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. The CAP national strategic plan 2023-2027 allocates French agriculture about €9.1bn a year (official document of 2022). Secondary sources give €9.4bn a year, of which €8.7bn for the PSN. The transfer from the first to the second pillar is 7.5%. The post-2027 EU financial framework is under negotiation.

Horizon. Not applicable.

Limits. The PAC (Common Agricultural Policy) is funded by the EU budget. A national position (capping, convergence, greening) redistributes the envelope with no net cost for the national budget. Only national co-financing of the second pillar or a substitute national aid would have a cost. If a candidate proposes to « renationaliser » [“renationalise”] the PAC, the cost would be about €9bn per year of national spending, less the reduction in the French contribution to the EU budget, which is not costed here.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

  1. avecretailleau.fr, mesure n° 57 « Garantir le budget agricole européen sur sept ans ». Read the programme page.

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)