Déchiffrer 2027

FREN

Climate, David Lisnard

Adaptation to climate change: Fires: more resources for the SDIS (fire and rescue services) by reallocating existing revenue

Direction of change: increase, compared with current law.

The lever. Public resources to cope with the effects of global warming (heatwaves, droughts, fires, floods, coastal submersion): national adaptation plan, risk prevention fund, civil protection. Excludes emissions reduction. Direction rule: ↑ more public resources for adaptation.

Words reported by Nouvelle Énergie, « Incendies : soutenir ceux qui agissent et lever les obstacles qui les empêchent d’agir », compte rendu de ses propositions: Le troisième obstacle est celui du financement. Les services départementaux d’incendie et de secours accomplissent des missions toujours plus nombreuses sans disposer des ressources correspondantes. Une partie des recettes déjà prélevées doit être réaffectée vers les collectivités et les services qui assurent effectivement la protection des populations, plutôt que de créer de nouveaux impôts. […] L’eau doit être disponible immédiatement et les moyens terrestres doivent être renforcés. Il faut investir dans les infrastructures de stockage, réduire la pression exercée sur les réseaux d’eau potable et préparer les prochaines années sans attendre.1

Translation by the editorsThe third obstacle is funding. The departmental fire and rescue services carry out ever more missions without having the corresponding resources. Part of the revenue already levied must be reallocated to the local authorities and services that actually protect the population, rather than creating new taxes. […] Water must be available immediately and ground resources must be strengthened. We must invest in storage infrastructure, reduce the pressure on drinking water networks and prepare for the coming years without waiting.

Words of David Lisnard reported by Nouvelle Énergie, « Incendies : soutenir ceux qui agissent et lever les obstacles qui les empêchent d’agir », compte rendu de ses propositions, 31 July 2026. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme.

Encoding

No cost-schedule parameter for this position: see the costing for the reason.

Costing

Announced by the candidate

not announced

The cited source does not cost this measure.

Published costings

none

No external costing of this position recorded to date.

Our calculation

not costed

Reallocation of « une partie des recettes déjà prélevées » [“part of the revenue already collected”] to the SDIS (fire and rescue services) and local authorities, reinforced ground resources and water storage, with no amount: nothing to cost. The text finances these resources through redeployment, not through a new tax; the net balance for public finances is not stated.

Current law, sources and limits of the cost schedule

Current law. Third national climate change adaptation plan (PNACC-3), announced on 10 March 2025, which adopts a reference warming trajectory of +4 °C by 2100. Fonds de prévention des risques naturels majeurs (major natural hazards prevention fund, « fonds Barnier », programme 181): €300m in commitment authorisations and €228.8m in payment appropriations in the LFI 2026; €300m and €238.8m in the PLF 2027. Fonds vert (green fund): €1bn in commitment authorisations and €981.4m in payment appropriations in the PLF 2027, including a dedicated adaptation envelope of €500m in commitment authorisations.

Horizon. Spending in a full year, static: €1 announced = €1 of deficit, compared with current policies.

Limits. Envelope parameter, like public investment or rail: it applies only to an amount announced on top of current resources. A fund announced as a total amount that brings together existing appropriations is counted by the gap with those appropriations, in payment appropriations of the PLF 2027 (Barnier fund €238.8m, Fonds vert €981.4m), the reading in commitment appropriations (€300m and €1bn) being cited in the note. Adaptation spending is scattered (Barnier fund, Fonds vert, civil protection, agriculture, health, local authorities) and has no official total: the Cour des comptes (2024) notes « l'absence de chiffrages exhaustifs et cohérents pour l'ensemble des acteurs publics » [“the absence of exhaustive and consistent costings for all public actors”], and I4CE (2025) identifies €1.7bn explicitly dedicated to adaptation in 2025. Benchmarks, not counted: the National Assembly's flash fact-finding mission on summer 2026 (rapporteur Éric Coquerel) estimates the cost of that summer at about €16bn and puts the public spending needed from summer 2027 at between €10bn and €13.6bn; these are estimates, not coefficients. A plan that funds investment works may overlap a public investment envelope (overlap declared); a plan that strengthens hospitals or care homes (EHPAD) is not also counted on the hospital or old-age levers.

How to read these amounts. These are static costs and revenues, with no feedback effect, over a full year: nothing on growth, employment or the revenue that economic activity would gain or lose. A higher net cost does not on its own make a worse policy, nor net savings a better one: each programme rests on an economic model (demand-led stimulus, lower compulsory levies, consolidation of the public accounts…) that the cost schedule does not settle. GDP itself measures a volume of activity, not well-being or the usefulness of what is produced. Economic models and feedback effects.

This lever in the method · Costing for David Lisnard

  1. Nouvelle Énergie, « Incendies : soutenir ceux qui agissent et lever les obstacles qui les empêchent d’agir », compte rendu de ses propositions, 31 July 2026. Words of David Lisnard reported by this outlet: the text quoted is the article’s, not their exact words. Position taken from public statements, not from a written programme. Read the source (Nouvelle Énergie, « Incendies : soutenir ceux qui agissent et lever les obstacles qui les empêchent d’agir », compte rendu de ses propositions).

Contest this encoding (prefilled email; procedure and deadlines)